Warning: include_once(/home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-support/wordpress-support.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php on line 306

Warning: include_once(): Failed opening '/home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-support/wordpress-support.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php:/usr/local/php5/lib/pear') in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php on line 306

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php:306) in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-content/themes/viewport/framework/zilla-admin-init.php on line 16

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php:306) in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-content/themes/viewport/framework/zilla-admin-init.php on line 16

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php:306) in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Read vs. View http://designnotes.info/?p=1618 Testing & Sprinting Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.6 By: Nikki - logo design guru http://designnotes.info/?p=1618&cpage=1#comment-100185 Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:01:37 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1618#comment-100185 People have become lazy in this era. I mean seriously, ask anyone, if given the option people would usually always pick view over read. They would rather information be told to them. I say get away from that mind set and though we do live in a time of convenience, laziness should be executed.

]]>
By: Sameer Vasta http://designnotes.info/?p=1618&cpage=1#comment-100186 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:24:05 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1618#comment-100186 I think the label “More >” is a much more apt label in this case. It's not an imperative telling you do to do something, it's an indicator of extra information. What you do with that information is your own choice.

I dunno, that's just me thinking out loud.

]]>
By: michaelsurtees http://designnotes.info/?p=1618&cpage=1#comment-100189 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:42:19 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1618#comment-100189 When I go to cnn.com I never click on their video icon, but if there was a option to jump to the video page with some text before the video started it would be a lot better of an experience. So in that sense I can relate to what you're saying. As video pages go, the example in my other comment does a pretty good job where cnn doesn't.

]]>
By: michaelsurtees http://designnotes.info/?p=1618&cpage=1#comment-100191 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:39:45 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1618#comment-100191 I def. don't disagree w/ the idea of clickable, downloadable or even emedable – of all the people online that don't publish their own stuff I wonder how many people really do that after the novelty wears off? I haven't come across any stats one way or another but I'd be interested to read the percentage.

]]>
By: michaelsurtees http://designnotes.info/?p=1618&cpage=1#comment-100187 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:33:45 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1618#comment-100187 I probably should have posted the original url in question to show the example: http://clusterstock.alleyinsider.com/2008/12/wa

]]>
By: seanaes http://designnotes.info/?p=1618&cpage=1#comment-100188 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:22:29 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1618#comment-100188 For me I would be more likely to click to read more about the pushing than want to watch a video.

]]>
By: James http://designnotes.info/?p=1618&cpage=1#comment-100190 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:52:26 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1618#comment-100190 It's not reading, but it's certainly not passive. It's more active and aggressive than reading: constantly skimming and deboning block of information to find out what is useful, clickable, or downloadable.

I don't think it's possible to properly read on the internets. It's difficult to give yourself over to one voice or narrative . . . how many people read fiction online?

]]>
By: James http://designnotes.info/?p=1618&cpage=1#comment-103649 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 15:48:00 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1618#comment-103649 It’s not reading, but it’s certainly not passive. It’s more active and aggressive than reading: constantly skimming and deboning block of information to find out what is useful, clickable, or downloadable.

I don’t think it’s possible to properly read on the internets. It’s difficult to give yourself over to one voice or narrative . . . how many people read fiction online?

]]>