Warning: include_once(/home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-support/wordpress-support.php): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php on line 306

Warning: include_once(): Failed opening '/home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-content/plugins/wordpress-support/wordpress-support.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php:/usr/local/php5/lib/pear') in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php on line 306

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php:306) in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-content/themes/viewport/framework/zilla-admin-init.php on line 16

Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php:306) in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-content/themes/viewport/framework/zilla-admin-init.php on line 16

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-settings.php:306) in /home/surtees/designnotes.info/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Current Issues for the RT in Twitter http://designnotes.info/?p=1662 Testing & Sprinting Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:49:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.7 By: danielgm http://designnotes.info/?p=1662&cpage=1#comment-99086 Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:14:57 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1662#comment-99086 Instead of indicating whether a tweet was edited or not, why not display the original tweet? Perhaps entering “RT @danielgm” and the first couple words of the original tweet will find the tweet and include it right after the retweet. No reduced character limitation. No twitter rep sabotage.

So you'd get this in your feed:

[RT @nameyourecognize this is where] from michaelSurtees
[this is where the 140 or so characters go] from nameyourecognize

This would rely on the software to include the actual tweet, but in the meanwhile, doing today's typical retweet will still work as long as the first couple words are intact.

By: michaelsurtees http://designnotes.info/?p=1662&cpage=1#comment-99087 Wed, 04 Feb 2009 15:36:36 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1662#comment-99087 I'm going to preface some additional points to what you've both said with these bits of info that sort of mold what I think about twitter from the post http://anaandjelic.typepad.com/i_love_marketing

“twitter isn't about who's following you. it's about who you're following”
– Josh Kamler

“Twitter, being an open system, is interpreted by different people differently; is used differently on different media platforms and at different times; and is used for different things. Which is exactly why it's so awesome.”
– Ana Andjelic

….. ….. ….. …..

@Serge – I guess you have to ask why a person chooses to follow someone else. Part of the reason why I choose to follow certain people is that they might have access to people and ideas that work pretty well inside a RT. I also follow quite a few people b/c I'm curious to see how different media outlets use it. But some people might like reading tweets as personal anectodotes to their daily life and hate RT's. That's cool too b/c again twitter is interpreted and used in an infinite number of ways. Starring tweets is another underutelized part of twitter. I use it to save tweets that are more personal to me or needed for reference, so I don't think it would be that interesting to people that follow me and hence why I like the RT. Plus in a blog kind of way it's tipping your hat to someone that tweeted something good. On the other hand, those that choose to RT well known people and steal from those that aren't as well known is also a common practice that I see from time to time – not a huge fan of that…

@Joe – the tiny url issue is kind of interesting, I like how it saves space, don't like how I don't know what the real url is. Too bad we can't embed html that would save character space. Again to the noise issue you have to ask why you're following someone. I think it also depends what kind of twitter service you're using. If I was only looking at feeds from the web and not from TweetDeck I'd only be able to follow a 100 max. But w/ TweetDeck the noise is a lot less b/c there's different streams of people that I follow more closely. But again it totally depends on what you're hopping to get from twitter and how you evolve it as time goes by.

I guess my big caveat is that in six months time I may change my mind completely and think the total opposite. But at this moment that's kind of my feeling…

By: Joe Bauldoff http://designnotes.info/?p=1662&cpage=1#comment-99088 Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:39:06 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1662#comment-99088 I just started twittering, and although I am still learning the etiquette, I already see this as a big issue. Like the article that Serge linked to says… Since the user needs to do all the work, it creates a lot of noise in what should be a clean, concise transmission.

The http\tinyurl.com/blah's are ugly enough. Add several @namesidontrecognize (if you are RTing the comments someone made about someone ELSE'S tweet), pepper it all with some quotation marks, and halfway through reading the 140 characters, my ADD mind is already thinking about bacon and how much I'd like to go swimming.

I think your solution is a good one, Michael. The more Twitter incorporates into its UX, and the less the user needs to clog up their tweet with proper credit and cordial protocol, the better.

By: Serge K. Keller http://designnotes.info/?p=1662&cpage=1#comment-99089 Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:16:12 +0000 http://designnotes.info/?p=1662#comment-99089 And then there's a radically different approac, as suggestedby some: http://alexking.org/blog/2009/01/29/an-alternat